Hook: Sparks fly when cinema meets controversy — and Ranveer Singh's Dhurandhar has set the debate ablaze, with allies and critics trading barbs while audiences flock to theatres. Nikitin Dheer has publicly defended Dhurandhar, calling it a stirring, well-crafted espionage thriller that "destroyed false narratives" and proved Bollywood is "alive and ticking," praising the direction, performances and production values of the film.[1] Critics and columnists have offered contrasting takes: while some reviewers and commentators hail Ranveer Singh's performance and the film's scale as cinematic achievements, others and sections of the public have labelled the film "propaganda," sparking a larger conversation about politics, history and storytelling in mainstream Indian cinema.[1][3] Why this matters: the Dhurandhar debate is not only about one film's box-office or aesthetics — it's an example of how films that engage with geopolitics or national narratives can quickly move from entertainment into the cultural and political arenas, prompting questions about artistic intent, historical representation, and audience reception.[1][3] What supporters say - The film's defenders — including Nikitin Dheer — argue that Dhurandhar accurately reflects aspects of India's geopolitical past, celebrates strong craft (direction, cinematography, music) and unites audiences in appreciation of large-scale filmmaking rather than ideological divisions.[1][4] - Prominent voices in media have urged viewers to treat the movie as cinema first, with some reviewers lauding Ranveer Singh's central performance and the film's epic feel.[3] What critics and sceptics say - Detractors have accused Dhurandhar of carrying a political slant or propagandistic elements, prompting debate over whether the film crosses from dramatization into advocacy; this criticism has become a major part of the public conversation around the release.[1] How to judge for yourself - Watch the film with attention to both craft and context: note narrative choices, characterization, sourcing (when historical events are referenced), and whether the film presents multiple perspectives or predominantly a single viewpoint. - Read a variety of reviews — from film critics, historians (if available), and audience reactions — to distinguish between cinematic assessment and political interpretation.[3] Engagement prompt (CTA): What did you think — is Dhurandhar a cinematic triumph or a film that blurs the line between storytelling and propaganda? Share your take in the comments below and tag someone who should see it; if you found this perspective useful, please share the post so the conversation can keep going. Embedded image (free, relevant sample):
Sources: Coverage of Nikitin Dheer's remarks and the surrounding Dhurandhar debate as reported in news outlets summarizing the film's reception and controversies.[1][3][4]Citations
1.https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/dhurandhar-proved-bollywood-is-alive-destroyed-false-narratives-nikitin-dheer-2836309-2025-12-15
2.https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/bollywood/nikitin-dheer-defends-dhurandhar-amid-backlash-film-has-destroyed-false-narratives-article-153293306
3.https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/shobhaa-de-reviews-dhurandhar-ranveer-singh-chewed-up-the-entire-film-9811920
4.https://www.news18.com/amp/movies/bollywood/nikitin-dheer-lauds-ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-says-film-exposes-false-narratives-ws-l-9770448.html
5.https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/movies/celebrities/story/dhurandhar-proved-bollywood-is-alive-destroyed-false-narratives-nikitin-dheer-2836309-2025-12-15
6.
7.
8.
9.
---
This email was sent automatically with n8n